<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hilarity ensues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emesq.com/main/2008/06/17/hilarity-ensues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emesq.com/main/2008/06/17/hilarity-ensues/</link>
	<description>The Life &#38; Times of a Hypothetical Dead Man</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:49:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colm</title>
		<link>http://www.emesq.com/main/2008/06/17/hilarity-ensues/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Colm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emesq.com/main/?p=75#comment-338</guid>
		<description>I dunno, Jimbo Wales?

I&#039;m not noticing it being particularly typoriffic. You big sensitive gombeen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, Jimbo Wales?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not noticing it being particularly typoriffic. You big sensitive gombeen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.emesq.com/main/2008/06/17/hilarity-ensues/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emesq.com/main/?p=75#comment-337</guid>
		<description>Speaking of not winning a nobel prize, feel free to fix the typos in the comment (and subsequent quote). I can&#039;t even claim it as a lazy Monday mistake, or can I? 

&gt; how it’s a revolution and we don’t need no gad-damn professionals and so on and so forth. It’s a minority view, but they’re a loud minority.

Who holds that opinion??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of not winning a nobel prize, feel free to fix the typos in the comment (and subsequent quote). I can&#8217;t even claim it as a lazy Monday mistake, or can I? </p>
<p>&gt; how it’s a revolution and we don’t need no gad-damn professionals and so on and so forth. It’s a minority view, but they’re a loud minority.</p>
<p>Who holds that opinion??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colm</title>
		<link>http://www.emesq.com/main/2008/06/17/hilarity-ensues/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Colm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emesq.com/main/?p=75#comment-336</guid>
		<description>&gt; Very few bloggers are going to be a pulitzer prize winning journalists, nobel prize winning writers or anything like them.

And nor do they want to be. I&#039;m delighted so many people are writing regularly because I think it&#039;s a healthy thing to do, so I&#039;m approximately a million miles from taking issue with the bloggers themselves. It does however annoy me how relentlessly serious some parties are about the whole business of blogging, about how it&#039;s a revolution and we don&#039;t need no gad-damn professionals and so on and so forth. It&#039;s a minority view, but they&#039;re a loud minority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> Very few bloggers are going to be a pulitzer prize winning journalists, nobel prize winning writers or anything like them.</p>
<p>And nor do they want to be. I&#8217;m delighted so many people are writing regularly because I think it&#8217;s a healthy thing to do, so I&#8217;m approximately a million miles from taking issue with the bloggers themselves. It does however annoy me how relentlessly serious some parties are about the whole business of blogging, about how it&#8217;s a revolution and we don&#8217;t need no gad-damn professionals and so on and so forth. It&#8217;s a minority view, but they&#8217;re a loud minority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.emesq.com/main/2008/06/17/hilarity-ensues/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emesq.com/main/?p=75#comment-335</guid>
		<description>I was there for some of the educatin&#039; - I didn&#039;t see any Ivory tower... 

Speaking of knee-jerk reactions, on with the comment:

Rosie is right, some of the blogging &#039;A-list&#039; (is there such a thing?) are not great writers. But that isn&#039;t what blogs are about - it&#039;s a free, non-discriminatory, democratic platform for any old joe to slick his hook and shoot the breeze. 

Very few bloggers are going to be a pulitzer prize winning journalists, nobel prize winning writers or anything like them. 

There are plenty of folks out there who enjoy Cecilia Ahern, Dan Brown and their shiny babies - and if that&#039;s what they&#039;re into well let &#039;em get on with it. The same applies for blogging really, read what you like and drop a comment or two if you disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was there for some of the educatin&#8217; &#8211; I didn&#8217;t see any Ivory tower&#8230; </p>
<p>Speaking of knee-jerk reactions, on with the comment:</p>
<p>Rosie is right, some of the blogging &#8216;A-list&#8217; (is there such a thing?) are not great writers. But that isn&#8217;t what blogs are about &#8211; it&#8217;s a free, non-discriminatory, democratic platform for any old joe to slick his hook and shoot the breeze. </p>
<p>Very few bloggers are going to be a pulitzer prize winning journalists, nobel prize winning writers or anything like them. </p>
<p>There are plenty of folks out there who enjoy Cecilia Ahern, Dan Brown and their shiny babies &#8211; and if that&#8217;s what they&#8217;re into well let &#8216;em get on with it. The same applies for blogging really, read what you like and drop a comment or two if you disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quis critiquiet ipsos critiquies? at E. M. Esq.</title>
		<link>http://www.emesq.com/main/2008/06/17/hilarity-ensues/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Quis critiquiet ipsos critiquies? at E. M. Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emesq.com/main/?p=75#comment-334</guid>
		<description>[...]           &#171; Forget Lisbon Hilarity ensues [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]           &laquo; Forget Lisbon Hilarity ensues [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
